ads

Showing posts with label open Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label open Education. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

United States Certification Program education online


United States Certification Program education online

The Teach For America Interim Certification Program is a state-approved alternative route to certification and is open only to teachers accepted by Teach For America (TFA), placed in TFA’s Detroit region, and who pass the appropriate Michigan Test for Teacher Certification (MTTC) tests.
Entry to this program begins with an application toTeach for America. During the application and interview process with TFA, applicants will be able to indicate their preference for working in the Detroit region. TFA is generally a two-year program; during their service, corps members who don't hold teacher certification are required to participate in a professional education program. Members of the TFA-Detroit corps who do not already hold State of Michigan teaching certification and who choose the University of Michigan School of Education as their university partner are automatically invited to enroll in the Teach For America Interim Certification Program at the University of Michigan School of Education. In this program, students are provided with content methods seminars, field instruction, and job-embedded professional growth experiences to prepare and support their induction as teachers.
Those who choose to pursue provisional certification in the State of Michigan, must
1. Successfully complete the interim certification program.
2. Complete a third year of successful teaching in their placement.
3. Participate in four field-instruction visits and receive satisfactory ratings.
4. Compile a portfolio of evidence of successful teaching, including an employment verification letter; satisfactory performance evaluations from supervisor, a letter of recommendation from a supervisor or mentor; and the Individualized Development Plan required of all new teachers in the State of Michigan.  
Over the course of the two-year program, corps members work toward a pre-identified and sequenced set of instructional skills aimed at their ability to demonstrate specific program outcomes which have been aligned to national and State of Michigan standards for the preparation of teachers, as well as to Teach for America’s Teaching As Leadership framework. 
To support the corps members as they develop as novice teachers, the program engages them in a number of practice-based learning experiences. Corps members are expected to exhibit professionalism in their attendance and participation in these experiences in accordance with School of Education and TFA–Detroit’s policies and expectations:
• Biweekly content methods seminars (approximately 17 class meetings per year)
• Field instruction visits (4 per year) using the program rubric with written feedback provided to corps members, as well as face-to-face debriefings.

Assessment

Corps members’ successful demonstration of these skills is evaluated through field instruction visits, as well as a professional learning profile (PLP) that corps members compile. In consultation with U-M instructors, corps members design a plan for proceeding through the PLP and gather artifacts, such as videos of their teaching and sample student work with feedback. These artifacts are submitted to a personal electronic portfolio and evaluated.

Non-candidate for Degree (NCFD) Option

TFA-Detroit corps members enrolled in the certification program may also apply to the Rackham Graduate School as non-candidates for degree (NCFD)and earn credit for certification-program coursework. This application does not require candidates to take the GRE. Corps members elect two or three of the following courses for graduate credit, for a total of 5-8 credits:
EDUC 490 Content-Methods Seminar (3 credits) Receive credit for bi-weekly seminar
EDUC 638 Field Instruction (3 credits) Receive credit for field instruction and successful field ratings
EDUC 655 Professional Portfolio (2 credits) Receive credit for e-portfolio completion and participation in portfolio exhibition

Master's Program Option

The University of Michigan has also developed a master’s degree program based on our existing Educational Studies program. Corps members electing this option matriculate in cohorted courses along the program’s Urban Pedagogy pathway, further enhancing their understanding and abilities as skillful teachers. Classes are cohorted and occur in the evenings or on Saturdays at the Ann Arbor campus or at the University of Michigan Detroit Center to accommodate corps members’ regular work schedules in Detroit-area schools. They are also scheduled so as not to conflict with required certification program courses, which are a legislated mandate for those teaching under an interim certification.


Open education in Usa online - Latest Study on Retention

  Open education in Usa online - Latest Study on Retention
 
Open education in Usa online
Open education is a collective term[1] to describe institutional practices and programmatic initiatives that broaden access to the learning and training traditionally offered through formal education systems. The qualifier "open" of open education refers to the elimination of barriers that can preclude both opportunities and recognition for participation in institution-based learning. One aspect of openness in or "opening up" education is the development and adoption of open educational resources.
Institutional practices that seek to eliminate barriers to entry, for example, would not have academic admission requirements. Such universities include The Open University in Britain and Athabasca University in Canada. Such programs are commonly distance learning programs like e-learning, mooc and opencourseware, but not necessarily. Where many e-learning programs are free to follow, the costs of acquiring a certification may be a barrier, many open education institutes offer free certification schemes accredited by organisations like UKAS in the UK and ANAB in the USA where others offer a badge.


Latest Study on Retention – No New Information New study

Latest Study on Retention – No New Information
New study consistent with prior research on retention.
A new study, from the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC)Early Grade Retention and Student Success: Evidence from Los Angeles, has some public officials wondering if it is time to revisit the practice of retention.
It shouldn’t.
Retention is the name given to the practice of repeating an entire grade level. According to the study, having students repeat a year in the early grades helped numerous failing students reach proficiency in math and English.
The study reports that 41 percent of those retained reached full proficiency in math and 18 percent in English Language Arts (ELA). These percentages represented significant increases over the recorded proficiency levels of these students prior to repeating their year: 6 percent in math, and only 1 percent in ELA. Ultimately, the researchers insist that blanket school district policies prohibiting retention are misguided and that the practice might be more cost-effective in certain instances than ongoing interventions.
While this may seem to be news and ultimately positive support for the practice, the fact is that this latest study is consistent with prior findings. Repeating material has always been a method for helping students increase their proficiency.
The issue is that retention does not fix a fundamental issue – some students are much slower learners than others. Give these slower learners more time and they will demonstrate positive gains over time.
But unfortunately the issue of pacing remains an issue for these learners. Students who attend summer school or repeat a grade will demonstrate greater levels of proficiency entering the new school year. And when asked to perform the tasks that they have been practicing will generally match the performances of their peers.
But the discrepancies soon begin anew when the teacher begins covering new material. Unless the retained students are given additional time, they soon begin to lag behind their peers, once again unable to match the pace of their on-grade classmates. Not too surprisingly, at year’s end the slower learners demonstrate lower levels of proficiency than their peers.
Therefore, the practice of retention has little in the way of lasting educational benefits for the students being held back. One or even a second additional year does not “fix” these students, especially if the teacher continues to utilize similar instructional techniques.
Furthermore, the negative impacts of retention on the social development and self-esteem of youngsters is well-documented. Retained students have higher dropout rates, increased behavior problems and greater absenteeism.
According to educational researcher Linda Darling-Hammond, the social issues are easily understood. Ultimately, most retained students begin to get discouraged with school and over time, give up on themselves as learners.
Sadly, in the standards era, retention is once again being used by school districts. In some cases liberally. And the latest study that offers some short term gains will likely allow those already implementing the practice to continue to use it.
But of course, retention, in and of itself, is simply not the answer. Instead, schools need to find ongoing answers for dealing with the slow learner.
In all fairness, additional ongoing interventions that seek to help slow learners remain with their grade peers often prove more costly monetarily than simply retaining individual students. But given the overall negative impact of retention long-term, investing in rigorous, ongoing intervention is the right way to ensure children make appropriate progress, socially as well as academically